This is a quick and dirty blog on an
issue I came across when discussing the relationship between the number of
physical interfaces and ospf link counts I hope it’s useful.
Understanding link counts can be
critical to ospf troubleshooting, if you don’t understand how the link count is
generated and its relationship to the physical link count then you can’t
accurately predict how many LSA’s you should be seeing!
Examine the output below:
Core_3#show ip ospf database
Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Link count
10.1.1.1 10.1.1.1 1767
0x80000005 0x006047 4
10.1.2.1 10.1.2.1 1001 0x80000008 0x002A9B 5
10.1.3.1 10.1.3.1 1766 0x80000005 0x00790A 3
10.1.4.1 10.1.4.1 1001 0x80000004 0x00DE64 3
Note there is a link count of 15 (we
will look at this more closely)
Looking at the links for 10.1.3.1 Core_3 we can see that there is a link count of 3
but this router actually has only 2 physical?
Whats going on??
To understand this take a look at the
interfaces on core_3:
Core_3#show ip ospf interface
Serial1/0 is up, line protocol is up
Internet Address 10.1.123.3/24, Area 0
Process ID 1, Router ID 10.1.3.1, Network Type POINT_TO_MULTIPOINT, Cost: 64
Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State POINT_TO_MULTIPOINT
Timer intervals configured, Hello 30, Dead 120, Wait 120, Retransmit 5
oob-resync timeout 120
Hello due in 00:00:25
Supports Link-local Signaling (LLS)
Cisco NSF helper support enabled
IETF NSF helper support enabled
Index 2/2, flood queue length 0
Next 0x0(0)/0x0(0)
Last flood scan length is 1, maximum is 1
Last flood scan time is 0 msec, maximum is 0 msec
Neighbor Count is 1, Adjacent neighbor count is 1
Adjacent with neighbor 10.1.1.1
Suppress hello for 0 neighbor(s)
Loopback3 is up, line protocol is up
Internet Address 10.1.3.1/24, Area 0
Process ID 1, Router ID 10.1.3.1, Network Type POINT_TO_POINT, Cost: 1
Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State POINT_TO_POINT
Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40, Retransmit 5
oob-resync timeout 40
Supports Link-local Signaling (LLS)
Cisco NSF helper support enabled
IETF NSF helper support enabled
Index 1/1, flood queue length 0
Next 0x0(0)/0x0(0)
Last flood scan length is 0, maximum is 0
Last flood scan time is 0 msec, maximum is 0 msec
Neighbor Count is 0, Adjacent neighbor count is 0
Suppress hello for 0 neighbor(s)
We can see that there is a point to
multipoint interface and a point to point interface.
Now let’s have a look at the interfaces
on another router called Core_2
Examining the interfaces on core 2 you
will find there are three physical links 2 x point to point and 1 x point to
multipoint but again this router is showing
a link count of 5 and this is your first clue as to what is going on,
remember each link is described by an LSA.
If we look closer at the LSA’s generated
for point-to-point links you will find that a point to point link is described
by two LSA’s one LSA describes the link to another router (point-to-point) and another
that describes the subnet between them as a stub network, we can better
understand this by examining the link as follows:
CORE_2#show ip ospf database router
self-originate
OSPF Router with ID (10.1.2.1)
(Process ID 1)
Router Link States (Area 0)
LS age: 518
Options: (No TOS-capability, DC)
LS Type: Router Links
Link State ID: 10.1.2.1
Advertising Router: 10.1.2.1
LS Seq Number: 80000006
Checksum: 0x2E99
Length: 84
Number of Links: 5
Link connected to:
another Router (point-to-point)
(Link ID) Neighboring Router ID: 10.1.4.1
(Link Data) Router Interface address: 10.1.124.2
Number of TOS metrics: 0
TOS 0 Metrics: 64
Link connected to:
a Stub Network
(Link ID) Network/subnet number: 10.1.124.0
(Link Data) Network Mask: 255.255.255.0
Number of TOS metrics: 0
TOS 0 Metrics: 64
From the above you can see that for the
link to 10.1.4.1 two lsa’s are generated describing the link to the other
router and the network itself as a stub network. One more point, you may not be
aware that there are several types of “TYPE 1 LSA’s” here’s a handy reference
table for them:
LSA Type 1 (Router LSA)
|
||
Link Type
|
Description
|
Link ID Field contents
|
1
|
Point to point link to another router
|
Neighboring routers id
|
2
|
Link to a transit area
|
DR’s interface address
|
3
|
Link to a stub network
|
Network/Subnet number
|
4
|
Virtual Link
|
Neighboring router ID
|
I
like to think of it this way, if you have only one choice of where you enter
and where you leave the network and no election is held then ospf describes it
as a stub. If there is an election held
and there are multiple exits (shared subnet) then it is described as a transit
network.
This is an important concept to grasp, talking with
others who are studying ospf they get really confused when there links don’t
tally up, so keep that in your head point-to-point links take two LSA’s to
describe them and the number of physical links do not equal the number of LSA
link counts.
No comments:
Post a Comment